Michigan Sea Grant

Activity Six
What's in This Water?

Objectives
Students will seek to answer the questions; What are the chemical and biological characteristics of water in which purple loosestrife occurs? Do these characteristic differ in wetland water dominated by indigenous wetland plants ( cattails, rushes, sedges etc.)?

State Science Curriculum Objectives
Constructing objectives: 13, 14, 15, 18
Reflecting objective: 11
Using objectives: LEC16, 17, 18, EH 10

Methods
Students will locate 2 wetlands one with and one without a medium to high density of purple loosestrife. Using water quality measuring kits ( Hach kits are inexpensive and work well for classroom use), nets and containers, students will sample and test the water for temperature, pH, nitrate nitrogen, oxygen, phosphates and macro-invertebrate indicators (all or part of these test may be used).

Background
A wide variety of information is valuable in understanding the impact on and spread of purple loosestrife in the wetlands. Scientist are in the process of gathering data on this widely spreading plant. In Canada, scientists mapping the location of purple loosestrife noticed that it has not taken hold and spread in more acidic waters and soils of the Canadian Shield but is found widespread in the more basic water and soils south of the Canadian Shield. Could the type of water and soil predict the spread of purple loosestrife?

Cattails and other keystone wetland species are known to cleanse water of pollutants such as nitrates, phosphates, chlorine's and other more dangerous pollutants originating in waste water, runoff, industrial discharges and farm runoff. These herbaceous, absorbent plants help capture and hold, use and change, pollutants and provide a barrier to sediment runoff as well as a sponge for excess water. Indigenous plants provide a breeding place for organisms of all sizes and types.

Purple loosestrife forms dense stands of vegetation crowding out other species. It is not useful for shelter and food as are indigenous plants. There is no indication that it absorbs and alters pollutants as do the major keystone wetland species. It definitely alters the ecosystem. Might this change effect the water and invertebrate organisms living in it?

It is important for students studying science to do real science and to do something useful with their findings. Exploring questions, using the scientific method, and communicating data to others builds true scientific literacy.

Materials
Hach kits for water quality tests chosen, thermometers, D nets or even small, department store fish nets, plastic jars for dipping, containers to transport biological samples, trays for observing biological samples, eye droppers and tweezers to place organisms on slides, dissection scopes or Brock optical magiscopes, biological indicator chart, and data sheets.

Procedure

  1. Using a USGS map, locate accessible local wetlands and ask students to assess them independently for stands of purple loosestrife. Choose one with and one without a medium to high density of purple loosestrife. The sites should be similar in as many ways as possible to control for intervening variables such as impact of nearby human activity or amount of water and depth. Obtain permission to use the site for sampling.
  2. Create data sheets to record chosen water quality tests in several locations at each site. Assign groups of students to each location at both sites. Groups assign each student tasks to perform during the sampling. Set parameters for sampling so that each group uses the same techniques. Do some research on the meaning of results for each water test.
  3. Visit site. Record qualitative observations of the site including kind of vegetation (algae, submerged plants and emergent plants), human use of site and surrounding area, visible animal life, overall impressions of the site. Record also an estimate of the amount of different kinds of vegetation, animals etc. If it is not possible for the class to visit the site, individual students could visit the site outside of class and bring observations and samples in for analysis.
  4. Collect water samples and biological samples for testing. Running the tests and observing for invertebrates can be done on site or back in the classroom.
  5. Complete water chemistry tests of water samples as soon as possible. If water is held overnight, hold water in closed container and refrigerate. Observe and record amount and kind of invertebrates sampled. Use pollution tolerance index for invertebrates. Complete data sheets for each site.
  6. Repeat for the other site.
  7. Compare the two sites using charts, graphs (visual representation), written description and group discussion. Did you notice any differences? Can you account for the differences based on what you observed on or near the site? Might the purple loosestrife account for the differences? If there are no differences, what do you conclude?
  8. Contribute your data to the Purple Pages (when available).Publish it in your local press with an explanation

Extensions
Find other schools that could do the same experiment and compare data. Discuss similarities and differences.
Compare water quality data to open water, ponds, lakes or streams in your area. Explain your findings.

Evaluation

  1. A completed scientific investigation including student created question, hypothesis, experimental design, data collection, analysis and justification of conclusions based on data.
  2. Observation of students use of water quality testing methods.
  3. Presentation ,with graphics and explanation, to class of findings.

Activities: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10



11/01/2007
Michigan Sea Grant promotes greater knowledge of the Great Lakes through education, research and outreach.
© Michigan Sea Grant.